Jeff Immelt Jeff Immelt: Green Is Green by Justice Litle The Rude Awakening Wall Street, New York Wednesday, March 22, 2006 Justice Litle discusses GE and whether its new CEO, Jeff Immelt, will continue the company's tradition of rebuilding from the ground up. ------------------------- - Less CEOs last century than the Vatican has had Popes
– the changing face of an industrial giant,
- Good clean tips for a good green portfolio,
- A few new currencies latch on to the market data and
much more...
------------------------- Justice Litle, reporting from the pristine shores of Lake Tahoe, Michael Steinhardt, one of the great money managers of the past few decades, contributes much of his success to a concept known as "Variant Perception." Simply put, variant perception involves developing a viewpoint at odds with the general consensus – and then investing on that viewpoint in expectation that the crowd come around. Steinhardt's concept works because so much of what succeeds – or fails – on Wall Street results from opinion and perception. Determining the proper valuation of a stock is not a simple thing. It has been said that a stock's valuation is less like a cut-and-dry mathematical formula, as academics would have us believe, and more like a rubber band attached to a peg. The more external factors involved in sussing out a company's prospects, the more flexible the rubber band becomes, allowing investors to wildly overshoot or undershoot. Nor is the peg itself in a fixed position. Changes in the economy, in capital flows, in technology and consumer trends, in business models and management decisions — all have a cumulative effect. Some changes are cyclical, guiding the peg up, down and back up again in a series of repeated movements over time. Other changes are structural, permanently adjusting the peg to a higher or lower plateau. Investors are historically much better at dealing with cyclical change, because it is based on the past. Structural change is much harder for investors to get right, because it involves things like detective work, intuitive connections and creative thinking (not to mention a willingness to break with the past). My most recent recommendation to the readers of Outstanding Investments is a classic case of variant perception and structural change at work. The recommendation is General Electric, one of the oldest and most admired companies in the world, with a market cap to rival Exxon Mobil's. --- Special Investment Alert ---
Warning: This Is Not for the Timid or Profit Shy! Starting with just $400, a pizza delivery boy created a $200 million fortune. He then taught his secrets to 14 lucky average Joes and Janes. Just five years later, the Wall Street Journal reported they had racked up $150 million in profits! Now you can benefit from the same kind of secrets - for your chance to make the same extreme gains. It's so simple, you will barely lift a finger doing it. If you have the courage and fortitude for this kind of trading, you can get in on this virtually effortless opportunity. http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/RTA/ERTAG328 ------------------------- "Green is Green" By Justice Litle ExxonMobil is America's largest conventional energy company. But General Electric is fast becoming America's largest non-conventional energy company. Strange as it may seem, these two corporate giants (GE: NYSE and XOM: NYSE) are on opposite sides of the same coin. As super-major oil companies like Exxon struggle to replace their oil reserves at a reasonable cost, the demand for alternative energy and clean technology will only grow stronger. Furthermore, due to the growing anxiety about global air quality, clean energy sources seem certain to steal market share from fossil fuels. GE is positioning itself to take full advantage of this shift. General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt is moving the company out of the financial engineering business and embracing the environmental technology business. Immelt's new catchphrase, "Green is green," captures the spirit of GE's aggressive push into clean technology, alternative energy and eco-friendly infrastructure. The all-encompassing tag line for GE's new strategy is "ecomagination," but the green reference (as in the color of money) is perhaps more descriptive. This is not just about doing well by doing good; the shift is rooted in hard-nosed business sense. There is money to be made in the environmental space: Getting out in front means leaving rivals behind, and all 17 of the various initiatives have been deemed commercially viable independent of their "green" angle. Sign Up for The Rude Awakening Start your mornings off with a dose of Rude news. The Rude Awakening is dedicated to highlighting phenomena in the financial markets that others may not see. Let the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times "break news." Sign up FREE Today! We will not share your email address with anyone else, period. -Andrew Palmer, Director E-commerce Marketing We Value Your Privacy |
Jeff Immelt: Not Just PR
Is the change meaningful, you ask, or is it just smoke and mirrors? The question is a fair one. Many industrial companies have tried casting themselves as green-friendly over the years, in a cynical effort to improve their public image and generate positive press. But in General Electric's case, this is no mere PR posturing. Words are being backed up by visible action, coherent long-term strategy, and some very big bets. In regard to the new "green is green" direction, The Economist observes that "Mr. Immelt is embarking on the most ambitious and risky strategy for GE since the 1980s," when Immelt's predecessor Jack Welch earned the nickname "Neutron Jack" for laying off 100,000 workers and rebuilding the company from the ground up.GE has a long history of creative destruction and strategic rebirth. Based on the company's history, it is practically an obligation for each new leader to dismantle and recast the vision that came before him. Jerry Useem of FORTUNE expounds on this venerable tradition: "During its 125-year existence, the General Electric Co. has glowed as steadily as Edison's lamp — even while continually overturning its own legacy. The only company remaining from the Dow Jones index of 1896, GE has had fewer leaders since then — eight — than the Vatican has had Popes. Each man stepped into the shoes of a predecessor who, in most cases, was considered the leading industrialist of his day. Each abandoned the approach of his predecessor. And each chose a successor who would change the company's course yet again — a remarkable record of continuity achieved through periodic revolution. 'What GE seems to have a genius for,' says Jim Collins, a business researcher and author of Good to Great, 'is picking the right person for the right time for more than 100 years.'" Jeff Immelt: The End of Artificial Precision Has GE once again picked the right man in Jeff Immelt? It would seem so. While Jack Welch was perhaps the most celebrated CEO in history — deemed "Manager of the Century" and "Princess Diana of the business press" — his track record is not without flaws. Under Welch's reign, GE developed a reputation for managing earnings, a process in which detailed estimates and aggressive growth targets were met like clockwork quarter after quarter. Throughout the '90s, GE's can't-miss performance was the financial equivalent of an Olympic archer hitting dozens of bull's- eyes in a row. Such perfection was clearly artificial, i.e., too good to be true, but Wall Street loved it. To explain the silky smooth performance, there was talk of "long cycle" and "short cycle" businesses blending into perfect synch with each other, meant to convey the image of GE as an analyst's perfect dream. After the dot-com debacle and telecom implosion, artificial precision went out of style. Spectacular flameouts such as Enron soured the public on shiny front ends hitched to murky back ends. It was during this hostile time when questions about Welch's legacy arose. GE's stock price went from a high of $60 in August 2000 to a nadir of roughly $22 in 2002. Part of that decline could be assigned to the broad market, but there were also growing accusations of financial hanky-panky. The company's powerful financial arm, GE Capital, was looking too much like an opaque hedge fund for some investors' taste, and Welch's aggressive insurance acquisitions were smelling more and more like an earnings-smoothing tool. (Insurance companies are ideal for managing earnings, because it is so easy to overstate profits by underestimating future claims.) Bill Gross of PIMCO Asset Management, an influential money manager known as "The Bond King," rubbed more salt in GE's wounds by making public accusations of dishonesty and refusing to buy the company's commercial paper. There was more legacy tarnishing yet to come. GE investors looked on in shock and disgust as the details of Welch's lavish retirement package were revealed by the courts. His nonfinancial "perks" were estimated to be worth more than $2 million per year, in the form of private jets, corporate apartments, financial services and so on. Welch voluntarily rescinded the perks to spare his company from further grief. Fittingly, the legendary manager and erstwhile earnings smoother ultimately decided shuffleboard was not for him; he wound up at a private equity firm, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice. Welch's track record of shareholder wealth creation surely counts as one of the greatest business achievements of all time, but the company he handed over was not in the best of sorts when he left. The new CEO inherited all the headaches. As if that were not enough, Immelt happened to take the reins three days before Sept. 11, 2001. An early point of order for Immelt was paring back the insurance side of things, an area that Welch had aggressively built up through acquisitions. It has taken a few years to get rid of the undesirable bits, with the biggest chunk — a property and casualty reinsurance outfit — bought by Swiss Re in November 2005. While a few small pieces remain (slated to be sold), Immelt was visibly pleased to be mostly out of insurance, a business he described as "a real burden" for GE. In further effort to restore GE's reputation, Immelt jettisoned the "long cycle/short cycle" jargon and the high-precision earnings targets of the Welch era, choosing to emphasize longer-term strategy instead. As a key part of that effort, Immelt embarked on an ambitious plan to recast GE as one of the world's leading environmental technology companies...Check in tomorrow for the rest of the story. [Joel's Note: Alternative energy has captured the imagination of forward thinking investors all around the world. Pioneers in bio-diesel research strive alongside scientists of solar energy and ethanol enthusiasts to figure out a way to fuel to earth beyond the oil age. One thing is clear; this is not an investment theme that will tire. Interest in finding and developing the "new oil" will not abate. Population increase, environmental disasters, industrialization and countless other factors work to deplete our oil reserves every minute of every day. Now you can learn how to start playing the alternative energy market with Justice Litle's Outstanding Investments. Dubbed the number one financial newsletter by Hulbert's Financial Digest, it's your first step towards a forward thinking, highly profitable future. The latest energy shock report is available right here: The Next Energy Shock - http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/OST/EOSTG328 --- Special --- The "Cure" for Medical Lawsuits - And Your Chance for 5,000% Gains! Don't risk your money in big pharmaceutical companies yet. Lawsuits are tearing apart the industry apart. Merck is facing over 9,000 lawsuits from VIOXX alone! Now one tiny biomedical company has a solution - a way to take the guesswork out of medical testing... forever! Very soon, EVERY big drug company could be knocking on its door. And that's just ONE way this stock could help you make 50 times your money - or more! Get the details here: http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/VPI/EVPIG319 ------------------------- And the Markets... | Tuesday | Monday | Week-to-Date | Year-to-Date | DOW | 11,235 | 11,275 | -0.4% | 4.83% | S&P | 1,297 | 1,305 | -0.8% | 3.92% | NASDAQ | 2,294 | 2,314 | -0.5% | 4.03% | 10-year Treasury | 4.72% | 4.66% | | | 30-year Treasury | 4.74% | 4.70% | | | Russell 2000 | 736 | 746 | -1.3% | 9.34% | Gold | $551.25 | $554.40 | -0.5% | 6.62% | Silver | $10.52 | $10.31 | 2.1% | 19.30% | CRB | 322.76 | 320.64 | -0.9% | -2.73% | WTI NYMEX CRUDE | $62.28 | $60.23 | -0.9% | 2.03% | Yen (YEN/USD) | JPY 117.33 | JPY 116.23 | 1.3% | 0.50% | Dollar (USD/EUR) | $1.2087 | $1.2169 | -0.9% | -2.10% | Dollar (USD/GBP) | $1.7467 | $1.7568 | -0.6% | -1.51% | Dollar (AUD/USD) | $0.7163 | $0.7201 | -6.0% | 2.26% | Swiss Franc (USD/CHF) | $1.3021 | $1.2915 | 1.0% | 0.61% | Dollar (USD/CND) | $1.1637 | $1.1610 | 1.2% | -0.32% |
|